http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/ Thoughts from the hobbit hole Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:55:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-902 Marius Mon, 07 Nov 2005 13:08:06 +0000 http://www.digitalhobbit.com/blog/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-902 Nope! They are using what they calls 'Lexicon' For more info check http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html. MRG Nope! They are using what they calls ‘Lexicon’ For more info check http://www-db.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html. MRG

]]> http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-88 DigitalHobbit Thu, 20 Jan 2005 05:50:19 +0000 http://www.digitalhobbit.com/blog/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-88 Yes, I found Google's spell checker to be very reliable. Do you know if they use a smart, context sensitive algorithm to come up with alternative suggestions? Yes, I found Google’s spell checker to be very reliable. Do you know if they use a smart, context sensitive algorithm to come up with alternative suggestions?

]]> http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-87 Chad R West Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:59:45 +0000 http://www.digitalhobbit.com/blog/archives/2005/01/19/debugging-via-google/#comment-87 That's too funny. I've found that Google has about the best spell checker around. No matter how badly you munge a word it comes up with what I was looking for. Thunderbird and Outlook don't even come close. That’s too funny. I’ve found that Google has about the best spell checker around. No matter how badly you munge a word it comes up with what I was looking for. Thunderbird and Outlook don’t even come close.

]]>