<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evaluating Ruby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/09/17/evaluating-ruby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/09/17/evaluating-ruby/</link>
	<description>Thoughts from the hobbit hole</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DigitalHobbit</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/09/17/evaluating-ruby/#comment-891</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalHobbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 05:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalhobbit.com/?p=168#comment-891</guid>
		<description>Yes, same here. :)

I agree that in most cases it is probably worth spending a bit more money to get more or better CPUs if it saves development (and maintenance) costs. On the other hand I suppose that there are examples of high profile sites (Amazon, Google, or Yahoo come to mind) that need to be highly optimized. In these cases I am sure every bit of optimization counts, and buying a few thousand extra servers is probably prohibitive... But for most enterprise applications, where a little bit of linear overhead won't have a huge affect on the scalability of the application, I am sure the benefits of using Ruby would be well worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, same here. <img src='http://www.digitalhobbit.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I agree that in most cases it is probably worth spending a bit more money to get more or better CPUs if it saves development (and maintenance) costs. On the other hand I suppose that there are examples of high profile sites (Amazon, Google, or Yahoo come to mind) that need to be highly optimized. In these cases I am sure every bit of optimization counts, and buying a few thousand extra servers is probably prohibitive&#8230; But for most enterprise applications, where a little bit of linear overhead won&#8217;t have a huge affect on the scalability of the application, I am sure the benefits of using Ruby would be well worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnÃ­bal Rojas</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalhobbit.com/archives/2005/09/17/evaluating-ruby/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>AnÃ­bal Rojas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2005 02:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalhobbit.com/?p=168#comment-890</guid>
		<description>The main point is that CPU is always going cheaper, good developers are expensive. I am just starting the process of learning Ruby and Rails after a LOT of years of J2EE development, and I am loving it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main point is that CPU is always going cheaper, good developers are expensive. I am just starting the process of learning Ruby and Rails after a LOT of years of J2EE development, and I am loving it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
